Mon-Fri: 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
Ba Israel Uncategorized Cold Brew – Is It Healthier than regular Coffee?

Cold Brew – Is It Healthier than regular Coffee?

If love cold brew coffee, you perhaps know that the brewing is different than the classic techniques. When it pertains to brewing temperature, you are simply looking for “not hot”.

Cold brew is obtained by steeping very coarse coffee beans in water at room temperature or even colder. Because the preparation water is cold we need to steep for more than 12 hours. At the end of the steeping procedure we then remove the coffee grounds for a clear cup. Compared to regular coffee, cold brew coffee it is never subjected to heat.

Certainly there exists confusion about cold brew and iced coffee. Even though both are served colder, there really is a great distinction between them.
Iced coffee is just about any coffee drink that was chilled and is served with ice cubes. If you want to prepare an iced coffee, you can use cold or hot brew, even espresso, if you prefer. The most important thing is to chill the coffee.

On the other hand, cold brew is a coffee drink that was never warmed during brewing. This is what will make it unique and it gives its particular properties. We can have cold brew coffee at room temperature, or chilled with ice.

The most common brewing procedure is immersion which is utilized in both commercial and home preparation. This is the easiest technique and the most practical.
A different technique is Dutch cold brew, which is also called cold drip and consists of dripping ice over a bed of ground coffee, in a similar way to manual drip coffee procedures.

One thing to remember is that cold brew at room temperature is fairly distinct from the one made in the fridge and this will create a difference in how much flavor you get in your coffee and how fast it will be ready. You should adjust your brewing duration appropriately (10-16 hours at room temperature; 16-24 hours refrigerated).

The extraction in cold water changes the composition of the cold brew coffee, and we get in turn a cup of joe that is a totally different beverage from your regular drip coffee, or espresso.
This particular distinction makes the topic of a hot dispute over the health benefits of the cold brew coffee. Cold brew proponents claim it is better than the regularly hot steeped coffee. Here is a list of the supposed benefits of cold brew coffee: more efficient caffeination, stronger antioxidant, it’s more roundedles acidic taste, smooth flavour profile, much lower acidity,stomach-friendly compared to hot brewed coffee.

The heated discussion was moved into the research field where two scientists revealed the facts behind the cold brew promotion.

This is how Megan Fuller and Niny Rao scientists from University Thomas Jefferson, have taken on the job to shed some light on the subject. The research has uncovered a few intriguing aspects which are introduced in this news release https://marketersmedia.com/naturecom-draws-on-health-benefits-of-cold-brew-coffee-for-in-depth-article/458713.

Related Post

How to Prepare for Meetings with Patent Attorneys in TexasHow to Prepare for Meetings with Patent Attorneys in Texas

When inventors consult with a patent attorney (Aheinze.co.uk),they often face a misunderstanding based on the commonly held stereotype of a “crazy inventor.” This understanding is the one that a minority of inventors in the industry agree upon. And yet,minorities can be a huge influence on majorities.

In short,to get solid representation from your patent attorney of choice,and to receive the most favorable terms, you can’t look like a crazy inventor. Sure,even an insatiable “mad scientist” could eventually find the perfect patent attorney after talking with so many. But wouldn’t you rather work with your first choice for a lawyer?

Keep in mind that patent experts are often wary of dealing with independent inventors. Knowledge is key to being better prepared – and above all,you will want to come to every meeting prepared.

One of the greatest obstacles for patent lawyers is when their client can’t or won’t help them. Whether it’s inability to help ( such as language barriers),or unavailability (ie,never available) who tries so hard to be ‘helpful’ that the attorney can’t make head or tail of what they’re facing and hearing.

The patent lawyer (read more at Aheinze.co.uk) is here to represent you. They are not the inventor. If you really have a unique invention,you know the invention better than anyone else. Your relationship with the patent attorney begins with the first meeting. The first impression is the strongest,so we can’t repeat this enough: you must come well prepared.

Inventions come in all shapes and sizes,so it is difficult to provide a broad consensus of what exactly you need to prepare when you’re coming to the meeting.

However,we can provide information on certain key points that the patent attorney needs to know,regardless of the type of invention:

  • The basic configuration of the invention

  • Optional upgrades to the invention

  • Diagrams and pictures. When it comes to key aspects of the invention,every picture tells a story.

  • If you have artistic skills,use line drawings as much as possible. They are an effective way of breaking down the invention into greater detail,particularly when you can create an “exploded-view” line drawing.

Prepare a package of detailed information on your invention,both written and with diagrams.

Your patent attorney will be much more highly likely to realize that you’re taking your invention seriously. It makes their job easier: they don’t have to sort out unorganized information,and it creates more value in the relationship.

Summary of Patent Law Tips

  1. Come prepared

  2. Present your invention coherently

  3. Prepare a detailed written description of your invention

  4. Take pictures – and if possible,draw line diagrams – that show the most important,unique features of your invention

Follow these tips,and you will find it much easier to work with the patent attorney you want to work with,rather than one who is desperate.

If this initial process of sufficiently describing your invention may seem somewhat intimidating,know that as an independent inventor there is help. There are patent attorneys who can advise you on the process. Patent Attorney Houston has advised inventors in putting together a strong patent package.

Holland Family Law: Your Compass in the Financial Maze of DivorceHolland Family Law: Your Compass in the Financial Maze of Divorce

When divorce looms, Financial disputes can quickly become a labyrinth of complexity and emotion. Holland Family Law stands as your trusted guide, offering expert navigation through these intricate financial challenges with precision and empathy.

Mastering the Spectrum of Financial Disputes

Our seasoned team tackles a wide array of financial issues in divorce:

  • Asset division (property, investments)
  • Pension sharing arrangements
  • Spousal and child maintenance
  • business asset valuation and division
  • Uncovering hidden assets
  • Cross-border financial matters

A Bespoke Approach to Your Unique Situation

At Holland Family Law, we recognize that each divorce case is as unique as the individuals involved. Our process is tailored to your specific needs:

  1. In-depth initial consultation
  2. Comprehensive financial disclosure analysis
  3. Identification of potential dispute areas
  4. Development of a customized strategy
  5. Exploration of suitable resolution methods
  6. Implementation and enforcement of agreements

Multiple Paths to Resolution

We’re adept at various dispute resolution techniques:

  • Negotiation: Facilitating direct, productive discussions
  • Mediation: Using neutral third-party expertise
  • Collaborative law: Cooperative problem-solving with all parties
  • arbitration: Employing private judges for binding decisions
  • Litigation: Robust court representation when necessary

While we prioritize amicable solutions, we’re always prepared to vigorously defend your interests in court if required.

Navigating Complex Financial Waters

Our expertise shines in handling intricate financial matters:

  • Valuation of complex assets (businesses, pensions)
  • Asset tracing and recovery
  • International property and jurisdictional issues
  • Tax implications of various settlements
  • Long-term post-divorce financial planning

Empathy Meets Expertise

We understand the emotional toll of financial disputes during divorce. Our approach blends professional acumen with compassionate support:

  • Regular check-ins to address your concerns
  • Clear explanations of legal processes
  • Emotional support and counseling referrals if needed
  • Realistic expectation setting

Your First Step Towards Financial Clarity

Our comprehensive initial consultations offer:

  • Assessment of your unique situation
  • Preliminary guidance on potential approaches
  • Clear explanation of the legal process ahead
  • Transparent discussion of fee structures

Ongoing Support Throughout Your Journey

We’re with you every step of the way, providing:

  • Regular case updates and strategy reviews
  • Assistance with financial documentation
  • Thorough preparation for all legal proceedings
  • Post-divorce implementation of financial orders
  • Advice on enforcing financial agreements

Choose Confidence in Your Financial Future

When facing the financial complexities of divorce, Holland Family Law stands as your steadfast ally. Our unique combination of legal expertise, strategic thinking, and supportive approach ensures that your financial interests are protected with unwavering dedication.

Don’t let financial uncertainties cast a shadow over your future. Contact Holland Family Law today to Schedule a consultation. Take the first step towards resolving your financial disputes with confidence and clarity. With our expert team by your side, you can navigate the financial challenges of divorce, secure in the knowledge that true experts are safeguarding your interests at every turn.

What does fault mean in the legal space?What does fault mean in the legal space?

What Does Fault Mean in the Legal Space?

In the legal realm, the concept of “fault” plays a pivotal role in determining responsibility for damages, injuries, or breaches of law. The term “fault” refers to the degree of responsibility attributed to a person or party for causing harm or violating a legal duty. understanding how fault is assigned is crucial in various legal cases, especially in personal injury lawsuits, negligence claims, and liability disputes. According to the Munley Law Glossary, fault is a foundational element in legal cases that deal with liability, and it often dictates the outcome of settlements, compensation, and legal judgments.

Types of Fault in the Legal Context

Fault can be classified into different categories based on the specific circumstances of a case and the type of wrongdoing committed. In most legal systems, determining fault is essential in proving that a party acted negligently or intentionally caused harm. The main types of fault include:

Negligence: This is one of the most common forms of fault in the legal space. Negligence occurs when a person or entity fails to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm to another person. For example, if a driver runs a red light and causes an accident, they may be considered negligent and at fault for the damages caused. In negligence cases, it must be proven that the responsible party had a duty to exercise care, breached that duty, and directly caused harm or injury as a result.

Intentional Fault: Intentional fault arises when a person knowingly and deliberately causes harm to another. This type of fault can occur in cases involving assault, battery, or other forms of intentional wrongdoing. Unlike negligence, where carelessness is the issue, intentional fault requires evidence that the defendant acted with a specific intent to cause harm or damage.

Strict Liability: In some legal cases, fault is assigned even if there was no intention to cause harm or negligence involved. This is known as strict liability. Strict liability often applies in cases involving product liability or dangerous activities, where someone can be held responsible for harm even if they followed all precautions. For instance, a company may be held strictly liable if one of its products causes injury, regardless of whether they acted negligently.

Comparative Fault: In cases where both parties involved share responsibility for an accident or injury, a concept called comparative fault may be used. This means that fault is divided between the parties based on their level of responsibility. Comparative fault allows courts to assign a percentage of fault to each party. In some states, if a person is found to be more than 50% at fault for an accident, they may not be eligible to recover damages from the other party.

Contributory Fault: Similar to comparative fault, contributory fault holds that if a person contributed in any way to their own injury or damages, they may be barred from recovering compensation. Only a few states in the U.S. follow this strict contributory fault rule. For example, if someone slipped and fell in a store but was found to be partially at fault for not paying attention, they may not be able to recover any damages.

Proving Fault in Legal Cases

To establish fault in a legal case, the plaintiff (the person bringing the lawsuit) must provide evidence that demonstrates the defendant (the person or entity being sued) was responsible for the harm or damages. The legal process of proving fault typically involves several key elements:

Duty of Care: The plaintiff must prove that the defendant owed them a duty of care. This means that the defendant had a legal obligation to act in a reasonable manner to prevent harm. For example, a doctor owes a duty of care to their patients, and a driver owes a duty of care to other road users.

Breach of Duty: Once a duty of care is established, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant breached that duty. In negligence cases, this breach can occur when someone fails to act as a reasonably prudent person would in a similar situation.

Causation: Proving fault also requires showing that the defendant’s breach of duty directly caused the plaintiff’s harm or injury. The plaintiff must establish that, but for the defendant’s actions or inactions, the injury or damage would not have occurred.

Damages: Finally, the plaintiff must prove that they suffered actual damages, whether physical, emotional, or financial, as a result of the defendant’s actions. Without proof of damages, a fault claim may not be successful.

-